Quantcast
Channel: The Buffalo News - police
Viewing all 8077 articles
Browse latest View live

Man accused of threatening Niagara Wheatfield co-workers

$
0
0
WHEATFIELD – A Niagara Wheatfield Central School District employee has been arrested for allegedly making threats to co-workers he blamed for upcoming layoffs, authorities said.

Ronald D. Mantell, 49, of Niagara Road, was charged earlier this week with second-degree harassment, Niagara County sheriff’s deputies said. He also has been placed on paid administrative leave by the school district pending further investigation of the case, deputies said. Mantell works at the district bus garage on Saunders Settlement Road, deputies added.

Counterfeit bill used to make purchase at Lockport Walmart

$
0
0
TOWN OF LOCKPORT – Police said they are looking for a man wearing an ”Evergreen Lawn Service” shirt who passed a counterfeit $20 bill at the Walmart on South Transit Road Thursday afternoon.

The man bought $94 worth of merchandise and paid with five $20 bills – one that was counterfeit, according to investigators. Surveillance video caught the transaction, according to reports.

Niagara Falls gun buyback program judged a success

$
0
0
NIAGARA FALLS – People were lined up 20 minutes before the start of Saturday’s gun buyback program sponsored by Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman and the Niagara Falls Police Department.

More than 100 people showed up, and Lt. John Conti said at least 120 guns were bought back.

“I would say it was pretty successful,” Conti said. “By the nature of people getting rid of guns in their house, it eliminates the guns that could potentially get on the streets. A lot of times it happens through a burglary or someone somehow obtaining a weapon they shouldn’t have.”

Residents received prepaid credit cards for their weapons. Those returning non-working/antique guns received $25 per gun; rifles/shotguns, $50; handguns, $75; and assault weapons, $100. Some residents returned several guns.

The program ran from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. at the old Niagara Falls Fire Department headquarters on Hyde Park Boulevard. A similar program in Niagara falls last year collected more than 100 guns.

Man suffers four gunshot wounds in drive-by attack

$
0
0
A man suffered four gunshot wounds following a drive-by shooting Saturday near Sumner Place and Rohe Street, Buffalo police said.

The victim, whose identity was not released, told police an unknown male fired at him from a car. The victim was taken to Erie County Medical Center by ambulance. Further information was unavailable.

Dragging incident on East Side culminates in crash, arrest of driver

$
0
0
A Buffalo driver accused of dragging a passenger who tried to leave her minivan on Comstock Avenue Saturday afternoon faces several charges in a bizarre incident that culminated in a crash.

Renee Brown, 39, was charged with driving while intoxciated, leaving the scene of a property accident and unlicensed operation of a vehicle.

Buffalo Police said that at about 3 p.m., passengers fearing for their safety demanded to leave te minivan but Brown refused to stop. However, one passenger who tried to get out of the vehicle was dragged a short distance vefore the minivan struck another vehicle and pole near Comstock and Kensington Avenue.

The passenger who was dragged was taken to Erie County Medical Center for treatment of injuries not considered life-threatening, police said.

Victim who was bound attacked with baseball bat on East Side

$
0
0
A Buffalo man was tied up and beaten with a baseball bat about 8:30 a.m. Saturday on Buffalo’s East Side.

The victim, identified only as Charles McCall, no age or address listed, was discovered with a belt binding his feet and a boot string around his wrists, police said. He suffered injuries to his head and both arms.

Further information was unavailable.

Motorcyclist faces DWI charge after rear-ending vehicle

$
0
0
DUNKIRK - A Depew motorcyclist was charged with drunk driving after being involved in an accident on Route 5, according to the Chautauqua County sheriff’s deputies.

Glen A. Smith, 49, of Lancer Court, was charged with driving while intoxicated and refusing to take a breath test.

Smith was arrested after deputies and Dunkirk emergency crews were called to an accident 8:44 p.m. Saturday on Route 5. Smith’s motorcycle rear-ended a vehicle in front of him as he was traveling east on the road, deputies said.

Rowdy Chippewa strip patron subdued by police

$
0
0
A 23-year-old Kenmore man was arrested early this morning after getting rowdy on the Chippewa strip, police said.

Nicholas Brent of Hampton Parkway broke a planter at Spot Coffee at about 2:10 a.m. after being told numerous times to leave the Noir Lounge by bar staff and officers, police said.

Brent ran from police, blocked pedestrian traffic, and was using abusive language, police said.

He was arrested near Spot, at the corner of Chippewa Street and Delaware Avenue. Brent refused to comply with officers and had to be forcibly subdued, police said. He was charged with criminal mischief, resisting arrest, and disorderly conduct.

Police probe link between shooting and fleeing driver

$
0
0
A 30-year-old man shot multiple times on Buffalo’s East side early this morning is hospitalized in stable condition, according to police.

Meanwhile, police have arrested another man, Timothy L. Jones, 34, of Buffalo, for attempted assault on an officer, and are investigating whether Jones has any link to the 4 a.m. shooting of the 30-year-old.

Police were responding to the 4 a.m. shooting at East Ferry Street and Fillmore Avenue when they spotted a 2014 Ford fleeing the area, according to Michael J. DeGeorge, police department spokesman. Police attempted to stop the vehicle, but the driver twice responded by striking a police vehicle with his Ford, DeGeorge said.

At point one, police said, they thought they had Jones’ vehicle boxed in, but Jones managed to drive away, nearly striking an officer. The driver eventually hit a curb, blew a tire, and was arrested by police near Carlton and Peach streets, police said.

Jones was charged with attempted assault on an officer, fleeing from an officer, reckless driving, and criminal possession of stolen property. Jones is currently on parole for drug possession charges, police said.

Meanwhile, homicide detectives continue investigating the shooting that occurred in the vicinity of East Ferry and Fillmore. The 30-year-old victim was taken to Erie County Medical Center in a private vehicle, police said.

The victim’s identity was not released.

Items worth $2,000 stolen from parked car

$
0
0


A thief used a decorative brick from the front lawn of a South Buffalo home to smash the window of a car parked in a nearby driveway, police said. The thief then stole an assortment of electronics from the car, including a laptop, MP-3 player and external hard drive, police said.

The incident occurred between 4 a.m. and 8 a.m. Sunday on Hammerschmidt Avenue, off Seneca Street. The total value of the stolen items was estimated at $2,000.

Property worth $6,200 stolen from garage

$
0
0
A burglar made a hole in the roof of a garage on Herkimer Street, then slipped into the garage and stole a generator and jack from the premises, Buffalo police said.

The theft was reported Sunday by the garage owner, who estimated the value of the stolen property at $6,200.

Mother faces murder trial in death of girl, 8

$
0
0
Candace Croff Cartagena goes on trial today, more than 3½ years after her 8-year-old daughter was found dead in the East Amherst home where Cartagena lived alone after her husband and then her daughter moved out.

The mother was found moaning and mumbling in a backyard shed that same night.

The cause of death is expected to be a bone of contention during the nonjury trial before Erie County Judge Thomas P. Franczyk. Cartagena, 35, is charged with second-degree murder.

The prosecution says Bianca Cartagena died from asphyxiation, alleging that her mother smothered her in the bed where her body was found under the covers Nov. 30, 2010.

The defense says the girl died as a result of a problem with a vital organ.

Both sides are expected to call medical experts.

Cartagena, then 31, was going through a divorce, bankruptcy and foreclosure at the time of her daughter’s death.

On the night that the defendant was found semiconscious in the shed and Bianca’s body was found in her mother’s bed, Cartagena told police she had tried to kill herself the day before by taking six different medications.

She had been living alone in the home after her husband, Ruben Cartagena, moved out earlier that year and her daughter went to live with the defendant’s parents in August 2010 after Candace Cartagena was hospitalized in BryLin.

The defendant told police that her mother had dropped off Bianca at the Cartagena house after school Nov. 29, 2010. She said that Bianca did her homework, after they argued about it, and that they played the games “Connect Four” and “Chutes and Ladders” in bed. Then they ate popcorn and drank ginger ale, she said.

Her last contact with Bianca, she said, was at 5:15 p.m., when the grandmother picked up the girl and took her to gymnastics.

But the prosecution contends that Cartagena told her mother not to pick up Bianca. She allegedly said that the girl would be spending the night at the Cartagena home and that she would see that her daughter got to school the next day.

When Bianca failed to return to her grandparents’ home the next day after school, they became alarmed.

Cartagena’s sister and stepfather went to the house on Greengage Circle and found the girl’s body in the bedroom, then called police.

The prosecution contends that Cartagena killed her daughter Nov. 29.

Cartagena also told police that she had tried to kill herself later Nov. 29 by taking six different kinds of medication to escape from marital problems, unemployment and foreclosure.

“I devoted everything to him, and he keeps leaving,” she told police, referring to her husband.

After taking the pills, she said she went in and out of consciousness and did not recall much besides waking up on the couch in the living room. The couch was wet from her urine.

When asked how she ended up in the shed where she was found the next evening, she said, “I never go in there. I hate the shed. All my husband’s stuff is in there.”

She also told the officers that she had a mental illness that her family refused to acknowledge.

After police found Cartagena in the shed, she was taken to Erie County Medical Center, where she spent the next several weeks in the psychiatric ward.

Cartagena later moved to Rochester. She wasn’t charged until May 2013, when a grand jury indicted her.

During the 2½ years between Bianca’s death and Cartagena’s indictment, some family members called for her arrest and publicly criticized the pace of the investigation.

After Cartagena was arraigned, Erie County District Attorney Frank A. Sedita III issued a statement: “Every case and every investigation is different. It is more important to make sure the investigation is truly completed and to get the case right rather than to prematurely present it to the grand jury.”

At the arraignment, Assistant District Attorney Thomas M. Finnerty outlined two key elements of the case – Cartagena’s use of text messages in and around the time Bianca’s body was discovered and her attempts at suicide.

He said Cartagena used those messages to reassure family members that Bianca was all right – when, in fact, police believe she was already dead – and then tried to delete them to conceal her actions.

The prosecutor also referred to Cartagena’s “exaggerated” attempts at suicide and suggested that those reports were part of a larger story concocted by the defendant.

John R. Nuchereno, her defense attorney at the time, mentioned the Erie County medical examiner’s initial report, in which Dr. Dianne R. Vertes ruled the cause of death as asphyxiation by unknown means, possibly homicide or accidental. She later ruled the death a homicide.

Nuchereno said it wasn’t until another pathology report came out, this one paid for by the family, that Sedita decided to investigate Bianca’s death.

Defense attorney Joseph J. Terranova, who took over the case earlier this year after Nuchereno withdrew to receive inpatient treatment for a pre-existing medical issue, plans to call a medical expert.

Vertes, now based in Binghamton, also is expected to testify.

The trial is expected to run all this week, followed by a two-week break, because the defense medical expert cannot testify until June 30. It is expected to conclude that week.

The case is being prosecuted by Finnerty and Assistant District Attorneys Kristen A. St. Mary and Ashley M. Morgan.

email: jstaas@buffnews.com

Racial profiling a lingering issue in Buffalo

$
0
0
Jeffrey E. Campbell II says he was walking home from a friend’s house around midnight last December when Buffalo police stopped him as he was crossing Bailey and Winspear avenues.

The police lieutenant said he was investigating a burglary.

“I look like a burglar?” Campbell responded, according to his attorney.

“Maybe. Do you?” the lieutenant asked, according to the lawyer.

Police then continued following Campbell for almost 2 miles as he headed toward his Deerfield Avenue home, the attorney said.

“Quit (expletive) harassing me,” Campbell said to the lieutenant at one point.

With that, two more officers arrived, the attorney said, and Campbell, 22, was arrested on seven counts of harassment, resisting arrest and obstructing justice, the attorney said.

Three months later, all the charges were dismissed in court. The city is now being accused of making a false arrest and using excessive force.

Police aren’t publicly saying much about the case because of the pending legal action, but one police source familiar with the incident privately said Campbell was considered suspicious because he was noticed near a yard carrying a backpack. Campbell was arrested, the officer said, because he “went off” when confronted by police, initially yelling, pacing and blocking traffic, and later fighting with and cursing at officers and generally acting belligerent.

The lieutenant, in his vehicle, followed Campbell while waiting for a second patrol car he contacted to assist in the case, the police source said.

But Campbell’s attorney sees it differently. The police lieutenant approached Campbell because the young black man fit the lieutenant’s stereotype of a burglar, he said.

“I feel this was a classic case of being a young black man in America,” said Campbell’s attorney, Roland M. Cercone.

“That he followed him for 2 miles proves that.”

Campbell is black; the lieutenant and two arresting officers are white, while a fourth officer at the scene is a black woman. The black officer was not involved in the arrest or the alleged harassment, Cercone said.

Campbell is the son of a retired police officer, Annette L. Parker, and is also one of the four teenagers whose 2009 arrests recently led to three officers being indicted for allegedly violating the teens’ civil rights by using excessive force when making the arrests.

In the 2009 case, Campbell and three friends, all 17 at the time, were charged with shooting a BB gun into a group of people on a University Heights street corner. The charges were reduced in court, and the four teens pleaded guilty to harassment. Campbell and teenager Donald J. Silmon sued the city and settled for a total of $75,000 between them – $10,000 to Campbell and $65,000 to Silmon.

In the more recent incident, all charges were dismissed in court. Cercone said that four times during court hearings, he requested that the Police Department provide him with supporting affidavits and depositions related to Campbell’s arrest. The documents were never provided, he said.

In March, Cercone made a motion to dismiss the case. “The judge turned to the prosecutor, and he said even the police officers said you can dismiss the charges,” Cercone said.

‘It may be a sadder comment’

The Dec. 2, 2013, incident occurred in E District, the same as in Campbell’s 2009 arrest, but Cercone said he does not believe that the December arrest is related to the prior incident or the resulting civil and criminal cases. Instead, he believes that the arrest has racial implications.

“I don’t think it is related,” he said. “Unfortunately, it may be a sadder comment – on being a young black man in America.”

Cercone filed a complaint of false arrest against the City of Buffalo and the Police Department in State Supreme Court and also a notice of claim with the city, which is the first step to filing a lawsuit.

Police Commissioner Daniel Derenda said that he was aware of the complaint and that it is being investigated by the department’s Internal Affairs Division. Derenda said he could not say anything more about the case, given the pending legal action. The Buffalo Police Benevolent Association declined to comment.

In court papers, Cercone accused police of harassment and using excessive force, as well as making a false arrest.

The arresting officers, Cercone said, ordered Campbell to go up against the car. When Campbell asked why, the officer slammed his head against the car, then frisked him, Cercone said. The officer did not find anything illegal on Campbell.

The police source, however, said Campbell was out of control, yelling at and pushing officers and refusing to comply with their requests.

Campbell’s attorney said he has not confirmed the name of the lieutenant involved in the incident or the black female officer riding with him, but Cercone identified the arresting officers as Andrew J. Whiteford and Charles M. Miller, who joined the department in 2012.

The accusations by Campbell related to his December 2013 arrest are the latest in a string of recent allegations regarding conduct by Buffalo police officers.

Officers Robert E. Eloff and Adam E. O’Shei were suspended three weeks ago in connection with a May 11 incident at Molly’s Pub in University Heights. The two worked as off-duty security at the bar where manager Jeffrey J. Basil is accused of pushing a man down the stairs, leaving him critically injured.

Eloff and O’Shei were suspended without pay while authorities investigate what they did – and didn’t do – at the scene.

Two weeks ago, Officer John A. Cirulli pleaded guilty to using excessive force April 19 in Riverside during an arrest recorded on a cellphone camera and uploaded to the Internet. He resigned from the police force.

Earlier that week, retired Lt. Gregory M. Kwiatkowski and Officers Joseph D. Wendel and Raymond M. Krug, now a detective, were indicted in connection with the 2009 arrest of Campbell and his three friends.

Krug and Wendel were suspended when the indictment was announced. The three pleaded not guilty when arraigned in federal court last Monday.

5-year wait faulted by cop’s lawyer

Krug’s attorney, Terrence M. Connors, is questioning why federal prosecutors waited five years to seek an indictment in that case. The statute of limitations was set to expire at the end of May. Federal officials previously said that it took time to review all the documents in the case.

“One of the things we’re going to investigate is why the delay was so long, and why it was filed on the eve of the expiration of the statute of limitation,” Connors said, adding that Krug “is a dedicated and decorated police officer.”

Kwiatkowski retired from the police force in 2011, when he was under Internal Affairs investigation for three incidents. He has contended that he was not guilty in all three instances.

email: sschulman@buffnews.com

Sedita has been under fire before for prosecution policies

$
0
0
In years past, Frank A. Sedita III was a popular prosecutor among street cops who admired his meticulous approach in the courtroom, but his popularity among that group has waned since he became the county’s top law enforcement official.

Their complaint about Sedita – now in his second term as Erie County district attorney – is that he cherry-picks cases that guarantee convictions. But none will go on the record about their complaints, because their departments depend on Sedita’s office to prosecute their cases.

Despite this criticism from local police, Sedita has been recognized by his peers for his work. He was recently named Outstanding Prosecutor by the Criminal Justice Section of the New York State Bar Association.

Sedita said he realizes some of his decisions upset police and families of crime victims, but he told The News that his decisions are based on the law, not on desire for popularity.

He also noted that critics of the nation’s criminal courts have claimed that unscrupulous prosecutors can manipulate a grand jury into indicting “a ham sandwich.”

“I will not engineer a ham-sandwich indictment in order to stick it to a suspect who won’t cooperate, nor will I do so to avoid criticism or controversy,” Sedita said. “To do otherwise might be more convenient and make me more popular, but it is also unlawful and unethical.”

On some high-profile homicide cases, Sedita has refused to prosecute or has taken extended periods of time before moving forward, to the exasperation of some in law enforcement.

Last fall, New York State Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman’s office took over from Sedita’s office on a 34-year-old cold case murder. State prosecutors charged Michael Rodriguez, 59, with killing his wife, Patti Rodriguez, leaving her body with 108 stab wounds in a Lackawanna cemetery on Good Friday, April 13, 1979. The case has not yet gone to trial.

After Sedita’s office refused to move forward with the case, the Lackawanna police chief in 2009 asked state police to re-examine the case and presented evidence to Schneiderman.

Sedita offered to assist the attorney general in prosecuting Rodriguez.

“It’s not unusual that professional prosecutors sometimes disagree with police officers and sometimes in their judgments on how strong or how weak a case is,” Sedita said at the time Rodriguez was charged.

Sedita, 52, has been with the District Attorney’s Office for 26 years and even the police who criticize him as district attorney have praised him for his courtroom presence.

His disagreements with police have never hurt him on Election Day. Sedita was first elected as the county’s chief prosecutor in 2008. And when he ran for re-election in 2012, he had the backing of both the Democratic and Republican parties.

Sedita also has strong support from colleagues throughout the state. In February, Sedita was named the state’s 2014 outstanding prosecutor by the Criminal Justice Section of the New York State Bar Association at the association’s annual meeting in New York City. He also was recognized as the state’s top prosecutor in 2006 by the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, and he is that organization’s president-elect.

email: lmichel@buffnews.com and dherbeck@buffnews.com.

Prosecutor says woman asphyxiated daughter, 8, in jealous rage

$
0
0
Candace Croff Cartagena intentionally asphyxiated her 8-year-old daughter nearly four years ago in her East Amherst home in a jealous rage after Bianca spent Thanksgiving with Cartagena’s estranged husband and his girlfriend, not her, a prosecutor said today during an opening statement at the defendant’s murder trial.

But Cartagena’s attorney said the daughter died of natural causes, citing evidence from a medical expert who will testify that she had an enlarged heart.

In her opening statement at the nonjury trial before Erie County Judge Thomas P. Franczyk, Assistant District Attorney Kristin A. St. Mary said Cartagena, who was 31 at the time of the Nov. 29, 2010 murder, lived alone in the house on Greengage Circle. Her husband, Ruben Cartagena, moved out during a divorce and Bianca moved in with the defendant’s parents because she no longer could take care of her.

Besides the divorce, Candace Cartagena was unemployed and her house was in foreclosure.

After she twice disappointed her daughter by failing to follow through on promises to take her to school on the first day of class and to take her out for brunch on her eighth birthday in early November, she became angry when she learned that Bianca had decided to spend Thanksgiving with Ruben Cartagena and his girlfriend and that Bianca also was going on a trip to Disney World with them that week, the prosecutor said.

“The defendant was home alone because Bianca had chosen to spend Thanksgiving with him,” St. Mary said, while Cartagena sat in an empty home that she had gutted by selling her stove, furniture and other items because she needed money.

“She was jealous, frustrated and angry,” she added.

Cartagena called her mother after Thanksgiving and told her she wanted to see Bianca before she went to Disney World. Her mother dropped off Bianca for a visit after school Nov. 29, 2010, with the understanding her mother would pick her up for her gymnastics class at 5 p.m., the prosecutor said.

But shortly after 4 p.m., St. Mary said, Cartagena texted her mother and told her to pick up Bianca early because she had a bad attitude about doing her homework.

But then something happened, the prosecutor said. Bianca apparently said something to Cartagena about her Thanksgiving visit with her father and his girlfriend “that ignited the defendant’s frustration and jealousy,” she said.

St. Mary said Cartagena sent the girlfriend a nasty email. “In her rage, she takes it out on her daughter and asphyxiates her,” she said.

Cartagena then texted her mother and told her not to pick up Bianca because she was taking Bianca and a friend out for dinner, then having her spend the night, St. Mary said. The next morning, she texted her mother that she had rented a car and would take her daughter to school, she said.

But when Bianca didn’t show up for school and did not return home, Cartagena’s mother texted her, asking where Bianca was, St. Mary said. Cartagena told her they had spent the day at the Strong Museum in Rochester and were on their way home.

These were all lies designed to prevent her family from discovering her at home with Bianca’s body in her bedroom, the prosecutor said.

She said Cartagena spent 24 hours in the home with the body before Cartagena’s sister and her stepfather went to the locked home, broke in and found Bianca under the covers in her mother’s bed. They called police.

After examining the murder scene, police found Cartagena in the backyard shed, where, according to the prosecutor, she pretended to be semiconscious at first but then awoke and answered their questions.

The defendant claimed she had taken numerous pills in an attempt to kill herself because she was distraught over her ongoing divorce, St. Mary said.

She said she took the pills around 5 p.m. the day before and that her parents had picked up Bianca. When police asked her if anything had happened to Bianca, she said she didn’t know because she had taken the pills.

When police told her Bianca was dead, Cartagena did not respond, St. Mary said.

“There were no screams and no tears,” she said.

Cartagena was taken to the hospital and later released, During that time, the prosecutor said, she told friends different stories about what had happened to Bianca. She eventually was charged with murder in May 2013.

St. Mary said there were signs that Bianca had fought for her life that night in her mother’s bedroom. The bed was in severe disarray, the bottom fitted sheet was pulled off, pillows were strewn around the room, and a sheet was pulled over her body and scratched face.

St. Mary said the medical examiner ruled the cause of death as asphyxia but initially left the manner of death as undetermined, saying she could not exclude accidental asphyxia. But she later ruled that it was homicidal asphyxia.

An expert in pediatric forensics, who was retained to review the case, agreed, the prosecutor said.

Joseph J. Terranova, Cartagena’s attorney, said in his opening statement that the medical examiner had changed her mind about the manner of death because she was under pressure from the victim’s family and others.

He said he will call a pediatric forensics pathologist who examined the autopsy results and determined that Bianca died of natural causes.

He said the autopsy indicated her heart was overweight. The medical examiner ignored the finding, Terranova said. He said his expert found the heart was misshapen and that Bianca died of undiagnosed dilated cardiomyopathy because of the enlarged heart.

“She could have died at a skating lesson or gymnastics lesson,” he said, referring to her condition. “Unfortunately, she died at my client’s home.” He dismissed the prosecution’s claims about his client’s motives, lies and a struggle in the bedroom as irrelevant, saying they have nothing to do with the cause and manner of death.

He said 99 percent of the prosecution’s opening statement was for the benefit of the media and members of the public who have been following the case for the 3½ years since Bianca died and the controversy over why it took so long to charge Cartagena.

During the 2½ years between Bianca’s death and Cartagena’s indictment, some family members called for her arrest and publicly criticized the pace of the investigation.

After Cartagena was arraigned last year, Erie County District Attorney Frank A. Sedita III issued a statement: “Every case and every investigation is different. It is more important to make sure the investigation is truly completed and to get the case right rather than to prematurely present it to the grand jury.”

The trial is expected to run all this week, followed by a two-week break, because the defense medical expert cannot testify until June 30. It is expected to conclude that week.

The case is being prosecuted by St. Mary and Assistant District Attorneys Thomas Finnerty and Ashley M. Morgan.

email: jstaas@buffnews.com

Email sent by Frank Sedita to The Buffalo News on Friday

$
0
0
District Attorney Frank J. Sedita III sent the following email to Buffalo News Reporter Dan Herbeck on Friday regarding a story Herbeck was writing about a hit-and-run case in Evans:

“I think one of the dynamics driving this ‘controversy’ is the assumption that proof of operation (the suspect driving vehicle at the time of the impact) is enough to prove a crime was committed. That, however, is not what the law requires. Contrary to some people might think or believe or feel, Leaving the Scene and Vehicular Manslaughter require proof beyond the fact that the suspect was behind the wheel. In other words, being behind the wheel, in and of itself, is not enough to prove Leaving the Scene and Vehicular Manslaughter.

“Every statutorily defined criminal offense (i.e. a crime) has a number of elements. In order for someone to be prosecuted for a crime, there must be proof of each and every element of that crime. I realize most of your readers are not attorneys, so I will do my best to explain what this means in non-legalese.

“Leaving the Scene requires proof of operation; i.e. that the suspect was, in fact, driving when the collision occurred. This is just the starting point. In order to support the charge, there also must be proof – not suspicion or gossip but proof – that the driver contemporaneously (i.e. at the time of impact as opposed to some later time) knew she hit a person and proof that the driver knew she caused injury or death to that person and proof that the driver, armed with such knowledge, made the conscious decision to flee the scene and not notify the proper authorities.

“Vehicular Manslaughter also requires proof of operation. Again, this is just the starting point. In order to support the charge, there also must be proof – not suspicion or gossip but proof – that the driver was intoxicated at the time of the impact and proof that the driver’s intoxication was the cause of the victim’s death.

“Intoxication is typically proven with some combination of the following: observations of the suspect’s erratic driving; observations of the defendant by a trained officer; field sobriety tests; and, a BAC test score of .08 or above. In the absence of such evidence, it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to prove intoxication.

“Assuming one could prove operation and prove intoxication (as opposed to impairment or having some drinks at a bar), one must also prove causation to support a Vehicular Manslaughter charge; i.e., the defendant’s intoxication was the cause of the impact. In other words, had the driver been sober, she would not have struck and killed the victim. Evidence that the victim was effectively invisible to a sober driver (because of darkness and dark clothing, for example), darted out into the middle of the road, and/or was extremely intoxicated himself, undermines causation.

“You asked me why this case was directly presented to a grand jury, as opposed to the defendant being arrested by the police. This raises another common misperception about the legal system.

“Most people think of the grand jury as a “rubber stamp” in the criminal justice system. In other words, indictment by a grand jury is a formality in the process that starts with the arrest (an accusation made by the police) and results in a prosecution. Indeed, someone claimed that in the hands of a certain kind of prosecutor, a grand jury could indict a ham sandwich.

“I’m not that kind of prosecutor.

“The idea of a grand jury goes back to medieval England and was envisioned as a check on the power of the Crown. In the modern era, a grand jury exists for that purpose, as well as another: to conduct an investigation.

“In this case, the police investigation did not produce enough evidence to prove either Leaving the Scene or Vehicular Manslaughter. That was not the fault of the police. There are no known eyewitnesses, other than the driver. The suspected driver exercised her 5th and 6th Amendment rights and declined to be questioned. Several of the suspect’s friends also refused to speak to the police.

“The grand jury is the only body that can compel cooperation in a criminal investigation. The police cannot but the grand jury can. That’s why we convened it. Although we dared not compel the suspect to testify (because that would confer immunity upon her), we had the power to compel witnesses we believed might have evidence but were holding back. In other words, we didn’t convene a grand jury to bury a case, we convened a grand jury in an effort to make a case.

“You also asked about the testimony before the grand jury and the legal charge to the grand jury. I cannot directly answer those questions because to do so would constitute a felony pursuant to Penal Law 215.70. I can, however, state the following.

“Regarding the proof, the prosecutors assigned to the case called many, many witnesses over the course of three weeks. They left no stone unturned in an effort to ferret out and develop a prosecutable case.

“Regarding the charge, in their role as legal advisors to the grand jury, prosecutors (especially less experienced ones) typically read the law without adequately explaining it. When it becomes apparent that the law needs to be explained or elaborated upon, that’s something a prosecutor must also do.

“In contrast to his role as an advocate at trial, the prosecutor is designated the legal advisor to a grand jury conducting an investigation. As such, he is under both a legal duty and an ethical duty to insure that the grand jury understands the evidence must be both legally sufficient (all the required elements must be met) and factually sufficient (with actual proof as opposed to suspicion or speculation or innuendo or gossip or unsubstantiated claims or gut feeling).

“If the prosecutor suspects her legal instructions were confusing or misunderstood, she is under a legal and ethical duty to make sure the grand jury correctly understands the law. In other words, it is unlawful and unethical for a prosecutor to secure an indictment for a case she knows to be either legally insufficient or factually insufficient.

“I have reviewed your questions with my prosecution team. Although grand jury secrecy laws prohibit us from going into the specifics of the presentation of evidence and the charge on the law, I can tell you that the majority of the grand jurors ultimately voted to issue a No True Bill. They were certainly not coerced nor threatened. The law–not the law I wish was on the books but the law that is on the books–was read to them and explained to them and that was their decision.

“You know something else, Dan? It was the correct decision, given the facts, the lack of facts, and the law. The grand jury did not determine the suspected driver is innocent. The grand jury instead issued a No True Bill, which essentially means there is insufficient cause or insufficient evidence to bring certain charges against the suspected driver.

“Had the foreman of the grand jury handed up an indictment in this case, the court would have been charged with the duty to review the minutes and would certainly have dismissed the indictment based upon the lack of legally sufficient evidence to support each and every element of the offense.

“You also asked for me for my opinion regarding the suspect’s guilt. I think you know that if I felt someone was innocent I would publicly say so (e.g. Kimberly Lawton). I will not state my opinion as to the suspect’s guilt or innocence but I will state my opinion regarding the grand jury’s determination that the evidence was legally and/or factually insufficient: they were correct. I agree with it.

“I understand there are strong feelings about this case. I also empathize with the anger and sense of loss held by the victim’s family, as well as the frustration felt by them, the police and maybe even some of the grand jurors. However, one cannot base a criminal prosecution on feelings or suspicion, no matter how passionately nor how genuinely held.

“When my office has sufficient proof of Leaving the Scene or Vehicular Manslaughter we prosecute it to the fullest extent of the law, and rarely, if ever, offer a plea bargain. However, in the absence of sufficient proof of each and every element of an offense, it is improper to bring an indictment for that offense. I will not engineer a ham sandwich indictment in order to stick it to a suspect who won’t cooperate, nor will I do so to avoid criticism or controversy. To do otherwise might be more convenient and make me more popular but it is also unlawful and unethical and a dereliction of my sworn duties.”

Sherman man arrested on felony DWI charge

$
0
0
MAYVILLE – A 29-year-old Sherman man was arrested by Chautauqua County sheriff’s deputies and state police Monday morning on felony drunk driving charges after his frightened wife called to say she feared he had gone out with a shotgun.

Michael A. Vanevery of 3142 North Road, was arrested without incident when his car was stopped near his home about 7:35 a.m. No weapons charges were lodged but Vanevery was remanded to the Chautauqua County Jail on felony charges of driving while intoxicated and aggravated unlicensed driving. He was found to be driving with a license revoked after a DWI conviction several years ago. He faces further proceedings in Sheridan Court later in the week.

North Tonawanda man arrested for DWI near Jamestown

$
0
0
JAMESTOWN – A 24-year-old North Tonawanda man was arrested for driving drunk after state police pulled his car over Saturday on Torrence road in the Town of Randolph because of an inadequate tail lamp on the vehicle.

Jesse R. Albares was charged with driving while intoxicated after tests showed he had a blood-alcohol reading of 0.19 per cent, more than twice the state’s legal limit. Before being released to a third party he was ordered to return to Randolph Town Court in several weeks.

Parole violator arraigned on crack-dealing charges

$
0
0
LOCKPORT – Ernest L. Ruffin, whose criminal resume includes two felony and eight misdemeanor convictions, pleaded not guilty Monday in Niagara County Court to a four-count indictment accusing him of dealing crack cocaine in Niagara Falls.

Ruffin, 36, of 23rd Street, Niagara Falls, is charged with two counts each of third-degree sale and possession of a controlled substance. The crack sales to an undercover police officer allegedly occurred Nov. 21 and 22, Assistant District Attorney Peter M. Wydysh said.

Assistant Public Defender David E. Blackley said Ruffin has about a year left to serve as a parole violator on a 2011 conviction for third-degree robbery: a holdup at a store adjoining the Rodeway Inn in the Falls Dec. 30, 2009.

Frewsburg man arrested for DWI after crash near mail box

$
0
0
JAMESTOWN – A 44-year-old Frewsburg man was arrested by State Police assigned to the Jamestown station on drunken driving charges after he allegedly crashed into a mailbox on Water Street in Frewsburg about 7:20 p.m. Sunday. James D. Kidder was charged with driving while intoxicated after tests showed he had a blood-alcohol level of 0.26 per cent,, more than three times the state’s legal limit. He faces further proceedings in Carroll Town Court in several weeks.
Viewing all 8077 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>